The influence of meat-and-bone meal and exogenous phytase on growth performance, bone mineralisation and digestibility coefficients of protein (N), amino acids and starch in broiler chickens (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Anim Nutr
  • v.2(2); 2016 Jun
  • PMC5941018

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

The influence of meat-and-bone meal and exogenous phytase on growth performance, bone mineralisation and digestibility coefficients of protein (N), amino acids and starch in broiler chickens (1)

Animal Nutrition

Anim Nutr. 2016 Jun; 2(2): 86–92.

Published online 2016 Mar 22. doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2016.03.003

PMCID: PMC5941018

PMID: 29767084

Sonia Y. Liu, Aaron J. Cowieson, and Peter H. Selle

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the influence of meat-and-bone meal (MBM) and phytase inclusion on growth performance, bone mineralisation and apparent digestibility coefficients of nutrients in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. The feeding study comprised 7 dietary treatments: positive control (PC, 9.0% Ca and 4.5% available phosphorous [AvP] in starter, 7.0% Ca and 3.5% AvP in finisher); negative control (NC, 7.2% Ca and 3.0% AvP in starter, 5.2% Ca and 2.0% AvP in finisher) diets incorporating a 3×2 factorial array of 3 MBM inclusions (0, 60, 120g/kg) and 2 levels of phytase supplementation (0 and 1,000 FYT/kg). Each treatment was allocated to 6 replicated pens with 30 birds per pen in an environmentally-controlled deep litter facility. A total of 1,260 one-day-old male Ross 308 chicks were offered starter diets from 1 to 14 days post-hatch and finisher diets from 15 to 36 days post-hatch. There were significant (P<0.05) interactions between MBM inclusions and phytase supplementation on weight gain and feed intake in starter diets. Phytase significantly increased weight gain in diets without MBM and did not influence weight gain in diets with 60 and 120g/kg MBM. Collectively, increasing MBM inclusion significantly reduced weight gain in starter diets (P<0.0001). There were dietary interactions (P<0.01) on toe ash where phytase significantly improved toe ash in diet without MBM and did not influence toe ash in the other two groups of negative control diets. There were no dietary treatment interactions on apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of starch and protein except that diets without MBM had significantly (P<0.01) lower ileal starch digestibility and diets with 120g/kg MBM had significantly (P<0.0001) lower ileal protein digestibility. No dietary influence on ileal fat digestibility was observed. There were dietary interactions on ileal digestibilities of isoleucine, valine and glycine. Phytase significantly increased glycine digestibility in diets with 60 and 120g/kg MBM but not in diets without MBM. Including 120g/kg MBM significantly (P<0.01) depressed apparent digestibility coefficients of 13 ex 16 amino acids in the distal ileum. This study demonstrated the negative impacts of MBM on amino acid digestibility and growth performance. Also, responses to phytase were more pronounced in diets without MBM, which may have been due to their relatively lower available P and higher phytate concentrations in comparison to diets containing MBM.

Keywords: Bone mineralisation, Digestibility, Meat-and-bone meal, Protein, Starch

1. Introduction

Meat-and-bone meal (MBM) is a potential source of protein, calcium and phosphorus in poultry diets for some parts of the world, including Australia, China and Southeast Asia. However, there are considerable variations in its protein quality and Ca and P concentrations. Ravindran etal. (2002) reported substantial variations in ash (13.0–56.5g/100g), crude protein (38.5–67.2g/100g), crude fat (4.3–15.3g/100g) and apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in 19 MBM samples from different rendering plants. Batterham etal. (1986b) reported that the availability of lysine in 8 MBM ranged from 0.68 to 0.88 for broiler chickens. The variations and poor amino acid digestibilities in MBM may be due to processing damage and the bone to soft tissue ratios (Eastoe and Long, 1960). Nowadays, it is well accepted that the quality of MBM is variable; therefore, MBM is analysed for chemical compositions prior to incorporation into broiler diets. In Australia, the inclusion rate of MBM in broiler diets rarely exceeds 60g/kg. There are limited reported studies investigating the impact of higher MBM inclusions on growth performance and nutrient utilisation in broiler chickens and the majority of previous studies were based on maize-based diets. One objective of this study was to investigate the influence of nil, standard and high MBM inclusions on growth performance, bone mineralisation, apparent digestibility coefficients and nutrient utilisation in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. The hypothesis was that the standard inclusion of 60g/kg MBM may not depress growth performance and nutrient digestion in broiler chickens whereas the higher inclusion of 120g/kg MBM may show negative impacts on broiler performance and protein digestion.

Phytate and phytate-bound phosphorus (P) is ubiquitous in plant-sourced feed ingredients and phytate limits P bioavailability and poses ecological problems as excreted P pollutes the environment. Phytate-degrading feed enzymes or phytases have been shown to liberate phytate-bound P and improve protein and energy utilisation (Ravindran, 1995, Selle and Ravindran, 2007). However, the majority of studies in the literature evaluated the beneficial influence of phytase in broiler diets with only plant source feed ingredients such as soybean meal and canola meal. As discussed above, MBM is potentially an important source for Ca and P in poultry diets in some parts of the world and because MBM does not contain phytate, MBM containing diets could be less likely to respond to exogenous phytase. Therefore, it is desirable to investigate the impact of phytase on the performance of broilers offered diets containing MBM. In the present study, exogenous phytase was included in diets with 3 MBM inclusion levels with the hypothesis that phytase responses in diets containing MBM would be less pronounced than control diets not containing any MBM.

2. Materials and methods

This feeding study complied with the specific guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney. The feeding study comprised 7 dietary treatments as tabulated in Table1. It included positive control (PC) diet with 9.0% Ca and 4.5% available phosphorous (AvP) in starter, 7.0% Ca and 3.5% AvP in finisher and negative control diets with NC, 7.2% Ca and 3.0% AvP in starter, 5.2% Ca and 2.0% AvP in finisher. Negative control diets were supplemented with 60 or 120g/kg MBM (10.27% Ca, 4.95% P and 0.61% Na), without or with phytase (1,000 FYT/kg, 1 FYT is defined as the activity that releases 1μmol of inorganic phosphate from 5.0mM sodium phytate per minute at pH 5.5 and 37°C, RONOZYME HiPhos). In finisher diets, the analysed Ca and P concentrations were 9.4% and 5.9%, respectively, in the PC diet, and on average, the NC diets contained 6.1% of Ca and 6.1% of total P. Wheat-based diets were formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of broiler chickens as shown in Table2. In the MBM supplemented diets, the inclusion levels of wheat, soybean and vegetable oil were adjusted accordingly to obtain similar protein and energy concentrations in all 4 dietary treatments. Analysed protein and amino acid in finisher diets are shown in Table3. The birds were offered starter diets from 1 to 14 days post-hatch and finisher diets from 15 to 36 days post-hatch. The starter diets were fed as mash; whereas, the finisher diets were steam-pelleted through a Palmer PP330 pellet press (Palmer Milling Engineering, Griffith, NSW, Australia) at a conditioning temperature of 80°C by the automatically controlled introduction of steam into the conditioner with a residence time of 14s. Finally, the pelleted diets were cooled in a vertical cooler to room temperature and crumbled. Wheat was hammer-milled (3.2mm screen) prior to dietary incorporation. Acid insoluble ash (Celite World Minerals, Lompoc, CA, USA) was included in finisher diets at 15g/kg as an inert marker to determine apparent digestibility coefficients of protein, amino acids and starch at the distal ileum.

Table1

The arrangement of experimental diets for broiler chickens.

Open in a separate window

Table2

Dietary composition and calculated nutrient specifications in starter (1–14 days post-hatch) and finisher (15–36 days post-hatch) experimental diets.

ItemStarter1Finisher1
PCNC1NC2NC3PCNC1NC2NC3
Ingredient, g/kg
Wheat637.7654.7666.7678.7741.6750.8762.8771.1
Soybean meal281.0276.2204.6133.0181.1172.2100.633.1
Meat and bone meal0.00.060.0120.00.00.060.0120.0
Vegetable oil41.637.136.135.144.139.538.537.5
NaCl2.32.31.30.51.61.50.70.0
Sodium bicarbonate2.02.02.01.61.82.01.71.0
DL-methionine2.62.52.72.92.52.52.72.8
Lysine HCl2.72.83.43.93.43.54.04.6
Threonine1.11.11.31.61.61.71.92.2
Limestone8.08.48.58.66.77.27.37.3
Dicalcium phosphate15.47.38.08.610.01.62.32.9
Choline chloride 600.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5
Vitamin–mineral premix25.05.05.05.05.02.02.02.0
Celite0.00.00.00.015.015.015.015.0
Nutrient level, g/kg
Metabolisable energy, kcal/kg3,060.03,060.03,060.03,060.03,148.03,148.03,148.03,148.0
Protein214.0214.0214.0214.0181.9181.9181.9182.0
Calcium9.07.27.27.27.05.25.25.2
Total phosphorus7.35.65.35.05.84.23.93.6
Phytate-P32.682.692.392.102.452.432.131.85
Lysine12.512.512.512.510.510.510.510.5
Methionine5.75.75.86.05.25.25.35.5
Methionine+cysteine9.49.49.49.48.58.58.58.5
Threonine8.58.58.58.57.67.67.67.6
Sodium1.81.81.81.81.51.51.51.5
Potassium8.58.47.36.26.86.75.64.4
Chloride2.42.42.42.42.12.12.12.2

Open in a separate window

1PC, positive control; NC1, negative control diet without MBM; NC2, negative control diet with 60g/kg MBM; NC3, negative control diet with 120g/kg MBM.

2The vitamin–mineral premix supplied per tonne of feed: [MIU] retinol 12, cholecalciferol 5, [g] tocopherol 50, menadione 3, thiamine 3, riboflavin 9, pyridoxine 5, cobalamin 0.025, niacin 50, pantothenate 18, folate 2, biotin 0.2, copper 20, iron 40, manganese 110, cobalt 0.25, iodine 1, molybdenum 2, zinc 90, selenium 0.3.

3Phytate-P calculation was based on 2.20g/kg phytate-P in wheat and 4.53g/kg phytate-P in soybean meal as reported in Selle etal. (2003).

Table3

Analysed protein and amino acid concentrations (g/kg, dry matter basis) in finisher diets.

ItemDiets
1234567
Protein184.4183.7185.4190.4184.1196.2195.1
Histidine3.93.83.83.73.43.83.5
Serine7.47.27.26.96.67.16.8
Arginine9.49.19.19.39.19.69.4
Glycine5.85.75.78.610.58.611.0
Aspartic acid12.512.212.211.410.111.710.4
Glutamic acid38.137.637.536.335.337.435.6
Threonine6.76.96.87.16.47.26.9
Alanine5.65.55.46.57.16.67.3
Proline11.311.111.112.313.312.613.6
Lysine9.810.09.810.29.310.610.3
Tyrosine3.73.53.43.33.13.43.3
Methionine4.04.13.94.44.24.54.7
Valine7.27.17.17.16.87.36.9
Isoleucine6.16.06.05.65.15.95.2
Leucine10.910.910.810.410.010.810.2
Phenylalanine7.67.47.47.06.57.26.7

Open in a separate window

A total of 1,260 one-day-old male chicks (Ross 308) were placed in 42 pens (6 replicates per treatment and 30 chicks per pen) in the environmentally-controlled deep litter facility. The birds had unlimited access to feed and water under a 24-h lighting regime of 23 light:1 dark for the first three days followed by 16 light:8 dark for the rest of the feeding period. An initial room temperature of 32±1°C was maintained for the first week, gradually decreased to 22±1°C by the end of the third week and maintained at the same temperature until the end of the feeding study. Body weight and feed intake were recorded fortnightly from which feed conversion ratios (FCR) were calculated. The incidence of dead or culled birds was recorded daily and their body-weights were used to adjust FCR calculations.

At day 36, five birds close to the average body weight in each pen were selected and euthanised by intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbitone and the small intestine removed. Digesta samples were collected in their entirety from the distal ileum, which were demarcated by the mid-point between Meckel's diverticulum and the ileo-caecal junction. Left middle toes were collected and pooled for determination of ash content and mineral concentrations. The composite samples were dried to a constant weight at 100°C and then ashed in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 16h. Then the ash content was weighed and analysed for mineral concentrations by plasma mass spectrometry. Digesta samples from birds within a pen were pooled, hom*ogenised, freeze-dried and weighed for chemical analyses. Nitrogen concentrations and acid insoluble ash (AIA) concentrations were determined as outlined by Siriwan etal. (1993). Fat concentration was determined in finisher phase by using the automated Soxhlet extraction as described by Luque de Castro and Priego-Capote (2010). Starch concentration in diets and digesta were determined by a procedure based on dimethyl sulphoxide, -amylase and amyloglucosidase, as described by Mahasukhonthachat etal. (2010). Amino acid analyses were completed in duplicates as outlined by Cohen and Michaud (1993) and cysteine and tryptophan were not determined by this extraction method.

Apparent digestibility coefficients of nitrogen were calculated by the following equation:

DigestibilityCoefficient=(Nutrient/AIA)diet(Nutrient/AIA)digesta(Nutrient/AIA)diet

Two-way ANOVA was employed to determine the main effects (MBM inclusion and phytase supplementation) and their interactions by a general linear model procedure using JMP 9.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc. JMP Software, Cary, NC). The experimental units were pooled pen means and differences were considered significant at P<0.05 by Students' t-test.

3. Results

The mortality rate during the experimental period of 2.94% was not influenced by dietary treatment. Birds offered PC diet had significantly higher weight gain (2,427 versus 2,311g/bird, P<0.005) and FCR (1.550 versus 1.585, P<0.05) than Ross 308 performance objective by one sample t-test. The influence of dietary treatments on growth performance during the starter and finisher phases are shown in Table4. Meat and bone meal significantly (P<0.05) compromised FCR in starter phase by 6.5% from the average of 1.381 in diets with 0 and 60g/kg MBM to 1.471 in diets with 120g/kg MBM. Inclusion of 60g/kg MBM significantly (P<0.0001) depressed weight gain by 4.3% in finisher phase (2,088 versus 1,998g/bird) and by 3.9% during the total feeding period (2,501 versus 2,403g/bird); whereas inclusion of 120g/kg MBM further (P<0.0001) reduced weight gain by 8.7% in finisher phase (2,088 versus 1,808g/bird) and by 13.4% during the total feeding period (2,501 versus 2,165g/bird). In starter phase, phytase significantly (P<0.05) increased weight gain by 7.8% in diets without MBM (398 versus 429g/bird) but did not influence weight gain in broiler chickens offered diets with 60 and 120g/kg MBM. Also, phytase tended (P<0.10) to improve FCR by 2.9% in starter phase (1.431 versus 1.390). There were interactions (P<0.05) between MBM inclusions and phytase supplementation for FCR in the finisher and total feeding phases. In the finisher phase, phytase numerically improved FCR by 4.0% in diets without MBM (1.618 versus 1.554) and by 4.5% in diets with 120g/kg MBM (1.913 versus 1.827). Similarly, from 1 to 36 days post-hatch, phytase numerically reduced FCR by 3.8% in diets without MBM (1.583 versus 1.523) and by 4.4% in diets with 120g/kg MBM (1.844 versus 1.764).

Table4

The influence of dietary treatments on growth performance in broiler chickens.

TreatmentsMBM, g/kgPhytase, FYT/kg1–14 days post-hatch15–36 days post-hatch1–36 days post-hatch
Weight gain, g/birdFeed intake, g/birdFCR, g/gWeight gain, g/birdFeed intake, g/birdFCR, g/gWeight gain, g/birdFeed intake, g/birdFCR, g/g
200398b562ab1.4112,0433,3001.618bc2,4413,8621.583bc
301,000429a587a1.3722,1323,3101.554c2,5613,8971.523c
4600407ab563ab1.3842,0413,2291.582bc2,4483,7921.549bc
5601,000403b546b1.3571,9563,2791.684b2,3593,8251.628b
61200361c542b1.5001,8083,4571.913a2,1694,0001.844a
71201,000353c507c1.4421,8093,3031.827a2,1613,8101.764a
SEM7.91111.1400.029337.20561.3600.039540.33565.9300.0327
Main effects: MBM, g/kg
04145751.391b2,088a3,3051.5862,501a3,8791.553
604055551.370b1,998b3,2541.6332,403b3,8091.588
1203575251.471a1,808c3,3801.8702,165c3,9051.804
Phytase, FYT/kg
03895561.4311,9643,3291.7042,3533,8841.659
1,0003955471.3901,9653,2971.6892,3603,8441.638
Significance (P-value)
MBM<0.0001<0.0010.037<0.00010.125<0.0001<0.00010.327<0.0001
Phytase0.3530.3470.0970.9590.5330.6330.8240.4600.445
Interaction0.0340.0340.8580.0920.2110.0480.0560.1530.043
Positive control3975531.3912,0303,2061.5812,4273,7591.550
P-value10.8870.3140.4050.7490.0310.3870.7370.0230.321

Open in a separate window

MBM=meat and bone meal; SEM=pooled standard error of mean.

a,b,c Means within columns not sharing a common suffix are significantly different (P<0.05).

1Comparison between treatments 1 and 2.

The influence of MBM inclusion and phytase supplementation on toe ash and apparent ileal digestibility of starch, protein and fat are shown in Table5. Negative control diets had significantly lower toe ash than the PC diet (10.46 versus 12.08%, P<0.005). Phytase did not influence (P>0.05) distal ileal digestibilities of starch, protein and fat. However, 120g/kg MBM significantly reduced apparent ileal digestibility of protein by 10.2% (0.805 versus 0.723, P<0.0001). There was an interaction (P<0.005) between MBM and phytase for toe ash where phytase significantly increased toe ash in diets without MBM (10.46 versus 11.63%) but did not influence toe ash in diets with 60 and 120g/kg MBM.

Table5

Influence of meat-and-bone meal and phytase supplementation on ileal digestibility of starch, protein (N), fat, and percentage toe ash in broiler chickens at 36 days post-hatch.

TreatmentsMBM, g/kgPhytase, FYT/kgStarchProtein (N)FatToe ash, %
2000.7650.8030.87910.46d
301,0000.7730.8070.88711.63c
46000.8550.7840.90012.34ab
5601,0000.8560.8160.86912.01bc
612000.8220.7300.85712.62a
71201,0000.8180.7160.84312.86a
SEM0.02510.01220.02640.2021
Main effects: MBM, g/kg
00.769b0.805a0.88311.04
600.855a0.800a0.88412.17
1200.820ab0.723b0.85012.74
Phytase, FYT/kg
00.8140.7720.87911.80
1,0000.8160.7800.86612.16
Significance (P-value)
MBM0.007<0.00010.341<0.0001
Phytase0.9320.4630.5700.038
Interaction0.9710.1820.7600.003
Positive control0.8020.8130.86812.08
P-value10.3510.5510.6820.004

Open in a separate window

MBM=meat and bone meal; SEM=Pooled standard error of mean.

a,b,c,d Means within columns not sharing a common suffix are significantly different (P<0.05).

1Comparison between treatments 1 and 2.

The influence of dietary treatments on mineral concentrations in toe ash of broiler chickens at 36 days post-hatch is shown in Table6. There were no dietary influences on Ca, Mg, P and Cu concentrations in toe ash. Negative control diet without MBM had significantly higher K and Na concentrations in toe ash than the other experimental diets (P<0.05). Inclusion of MBM significantly (P<0.05) decreased Zn concentration from 369mg/kg to the average of 341mg/kg in the diets with 60 and 120g/kg MBM. Phytase significantly (P<0.05) increased Sr concentration in diets without MBM but did not have significant impacts in diets containing MBM.

Table6

Influence of meat-and-bone meal and phytase supplementation on mineral concentrations in toe ash of broiler chickens at 36 days post-hatch.

TreatmentsMBM, g/kgPhytase, FYT/kgCa, %K, %Mg, %Na, %P, %Cu, mg/kgFe, mg/kgMn, mg/kgSr, mg/kgZn, mg/kg
20031.602.83a0.7314.42a16.0321.6122329.54a314b367
301,00031.292.33b0.7773.74b16.2019.1318032.90a367a371
460032.652.28b0.7413.76b16.5819.1318231.97a302bc340
5601,00031.732.24b0.7493.76b16.0518.7216821.13b279bc340
6120032.072.30b0.7433.66b16.4521.6919125.61ab273c328
71201,00032.682.34b0.7373.91b16.6520.2318620.67b291bc354
SEM0.62680.08340.01950.14480.38681.24510.962.71212.9410.22
Main effects: MBM, g/kg
031.452.580.7544.0816.1120.3720231.22340369a
6032.192.260.7453.7616.3218.9317526.55290340b
12032.382.320.7403.7816.5520.9618923.14282341b
Phytase, FYT/kg
032.112.470.7383.9416.3520.81199a29.04296345
1,00031.902.300.7543.8016.3019.36178b24.90312355
Significance (P-value)
MBM0.3050.0010.7690.0600.5360.2590.0660.020<0.0010.011
Phytase0.6900.0200.3230.2460.8630.1640.0300.0710.1450.240
Interaction0.4840.0060.4010.0090.5770.7130.1980.0440.0230.422
Positive control31.472.400.7993.9416.2218.9316923.30322337
P-value10.8850.0180.0270.0640.0680.0290.0070.0140.7240.054

Open in a separate window

MBM=meat and bone meal; SEM=pooled standard error of mean.

a,b,c Means within columns not sharing a common suffix are significantly different (P<0.05).

1Comparison between treatment 1 and 2.

The influence of dietary treatments on apparent digestibility coefficients of essential and non-essential amino acids in the distal ileum at 36 days post-hatch are shown in Table7, Table8. There were no significant differences in apparent distal ileal digestibility coefficients of the 16 amino acids between the PC and NC diets. Consistently, inclusion of 120g/kg MBM significantly (P<0.01) depressed apparent digestibility coefficients of 13 ex 16 amino acids, including arginine, histidine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, proline and tyrosine. Phytase significantly increased digestibility of alanine (0.760 versus 0.784, P<0.05). There was a dietary interaction (P<0.01) for distal ileal glycine digestibility where phytase significantly enhanced glycine digestibility in diets with 60g/kg MBM by 12.7% (0.768 versus 0.843) and with 120g/kg MBM by 8.90% (0.628 versus 0.719) but did not alter glycine digestibility in the diets without MBM.

Table7

Influence of meat-and-bone meal and phytase supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of essential amino acids in broiler chickens at 36 days post-hatch.

TreatmentsMBM, g/kgPhytase, FYT/kgArgHisIleLeuLysMetPheThrVal
2000.8700.8390.834a0.8430.8780.9450.8540.8150.809a
301,0000.8660.8380.836a0.8430.8810.9440.8540.8180.813a
46000.8520.8210.820a0.8290.8700.9400.8450.8120.801ab
5601,0000.8680.8330.829a0.8450.8760.9490.8570.8250.822a
612000.8300.7990.809a0.8150.8420.9270.8410.7830.775b
71201,0000.8150.7640.765b0.7840.8280.9210.8070.7590.738c
SEM0.01010.01080.00990.00970.00690.00530.00960.00970.0111
Main effects: MBM, g/kg
00.868a0.838a0.8350.843a0.880a0.945a0.854a0.817a0.811
600.860a0.827a0.8240.837a0.873a0.944a0.851a0.818a0.811
1200.823b0.781b0.7870.800b0.835b0.924b0.824b0.771b0.756
Phytase, FYT/kg
00.8510.8190.8210.8290.8630.9370.8460.8030.795
1,0000.8500.8110.8100.8240.8620.9380.8390.8010.791
Significance (P-value)
MBM<0.001<0.0001<0.0001<0.001<0.0001<0.0010.006<0.0001<0.0001
Phytase0.9290.3810.1900.5160.8000.9180.3590.7410.627
Interaction0.3180.0980.0220.0610.3340.3540.0610.1620.039
Positive control0.8780.8490.8460.8540.8860.9480.8640.8230.823
P-value10.5290.4810.3730.4390.4020.7720.4780.5870.355

Open in a separate window

MBM=meat and bone meal; SEM=pooled standard error of mean.

a,b,c Means within columns not sharing a common suffix are significantly different (P<0.05).

1Comparison between treatments 1 and 2.

Table8

Influence of meat-and-bone meal and phytase supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility coefficients of non-essential amino acids in broiler chickens at 36 days post-hatch.

TreatmentsMBM, g/kgPhytase, FYT/kgAlaAspGluGlySerProTyr
2000.7830.7990.8960.787b0.8200.8710.845
301,0000.7890.7990.8950.785b0.8220.8680.842
46000.7860.7470.8830.768b0.8000.8430.824
5601,0000.8300.7510.9000.843a0.8240.8810.839
612000.7120.6770.8740.628d0.7640.7900.808
71201,0000.7320.6320.8580.719c0.7380.8040.787
SEM0.01200.01380.00830.01470.01080.01050.0095
Main effects: MBM, g/kg
00.786a0.799a0.895a0.7860.821a0.869a0.843a
600.808a0.749b0.891a0.8050.812a0.862a0.831a
1200.722b0.654c0.866b0.6740.751b0.797b0.797b
Phytase, FYT/kg
00.760a0.7410.8840.7280.7950.8350.825
1,0000.784b0.7270.8840.7820.7950.8510.823
Significance (P-value)
MBM<0.0001<0.00010.002<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.001
Phytase0.0250.2350.994<0.00010.9940.0670.744
Interaction0.2760.1580.1780.0080.0830.1620.183
Positive control0.8080.8110.8990.8030.8330.8760.859
P-value10.1290.4200.8020.3150.3410.7590.208

Open in a separate window

MBM=meat and bone meal; SEM=pooled standard error of mean.

a,b,c,d Means within columns not sharing a common suffix are significantly different (P<0.05).

1Comparison between treatments 1 and 2.

4. Discussion

In order to determine the influence of phytase and MBM in broiler diets with nutrient compositions close to industry practice, the average dietary lysine (10.0g/kg) and protein (188.5g/kg) concentrations in finisher diets were formulated to be somewhat less than 2,014 Ross 308 nutrient specifications. However, these reductions in the PC diet (Treatment 1) did not compromise bird performance when compared to 2,014 Ross 308 performance objectives. Calcium and P concentrations were further reduced in NC diets (Treatments 2, 4 and 6) to investigate the capacity of phytase to release phytate-bound P. From 1 to 36 days post-hatch, on average, NC diets supported significantly better weight gain but similar FCR in comparison to 2,014 Ross 308 performance objectives. The reductions in Ca and P in NC diets are evidenced by significantly lower percentage toe ash results in NC diets in comparison to the PC diet. It is not straightforward that phytase tended to reduce FCR in diets with 0 and 120g/kg MBM but tended to increase FCR in broiler chickens offered 60g/kg MBM diets resulting in an interaction between MBM inclusion and phytase supplementation. One possible reason is that the 60g/kg MBM phytase supplemented diet (Treatment 5) had the lowest analysed lysine concentration (9.3g/kg) which represents an 8.8% reduction from the corresponding non-phytase supplemented diet (Treatment 4, 10.2g/kg). Moreover, feed intake and lysine digestibility were similar in Treatments 4 and 5. This unintended difference may have contributed to the inferiority of FCR in broilers offered the supplemented 60g/kg MBM diet.

Inclusion of 120g/kg MBM significantly depressed apparent digestibility coefficients of 13 ex 16 amino acids, including arginine, histidine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, proline and tyrosine. Also, there were negative linear relationships between MBM inclusions and digestibilities of all 16 amino acids in the distal ileum. Meat and bone meal inclusions also linearly depressed weight gain and FCR from 1 to 36 days post-hatch. The quality of MBM varies as a result of the rendering process and from the amounts of collagen in the raw materials (Batterham etal., 1986a, Ravindran etal., 2002). Skurray (1974) suggested that suboptimal MBM protein utilisation in chickens may be due to low essential amino acid digestibilities and imbalanced amino acid profiles. Meat and bone meal has a high gelatin content because it contains certain amount of skin, cartilage, and connective tissues; moreover, gelatin is deficient in tryptophan and sulphur-amino acids (Skurray, 1974). Ravindran etal. (2005) reported MBM protein digestibility was 0.61 in comparison to 0.82 in soybean meal for broiler chickens and cystine had the lowest digestibility of only 0.34. Earlier, Wang and Parsons (1998) had reported that cystine digestibility ranged from 0.20 to 0.71 among different 31 MBM samples and the high processing temperature depressed average lysine digestibility by 3.6% from 0.84 to 0.81 but reduced average cysteine digestibility by 20.8% from 0.53 to 0.42. The poor digestibility of cystine following heat treatment is almost certainly indicative of disulphide cross-linkage formation, which is amplified by hydrothermal processes, and results in reduced protein solubility. Hendriks etal. (2002) reported significant correlations between protein solubility and amino acid digestibilities (r=0.29, P<0.001) in 94 commercial MBM samples in New Zealand and Selle etal. (2012) found a correlation between disulphide concentrations and protein solubility (r=−0.518, P<0.001) in steam-pelleted sorghum-based diets.

It was anticipated that weight gain responses to phytase supplementation in diets without MBM might be more pronounced than those containing 60 and 120g/kg MBM. Phytase significantly increased weight gain in broiler chickens offered diets without MBM by 7.8% in the starter phase (398 versus 429g/bird) and did not influence weight gain in MBM diets. Consistently, similar trends were observed during finisher phase. It is axiomatic that diets containing MBM would have lesser inclusions of plant-sourced soy protein in order to formulate iso-nitrogenous diets. Selle etal. (2003) reported that the average phytate-P was 4.53g/kg in 22 samples of soybean meal and was 2.20g/kg in 37 samples of wheat. Based on these two values, the calculated phytate-P concentrations in the starter diets used in the present study were 2.69g/kg in diets without MBM, 2.39g/kg in diets with 60g/kg MBM and 2.12g/kg in diets with 120g/kg MBM. In the finisher diets, calculated phytate concentrations were 2.43g/kg in diets without MBM, 2.13g/kg in diets with 60g/kg MBM and 1.85g/kg in diets with 120g/kg MBM. Therefore, it could be expected that phytase responses would be less pronounced in MBM diets. Also, in non-phytase supplemented diets, MBM increased toe ash concentrations from 10.46% in diets without MBM to 12.34% in diets with 60g/kg MBM and 12.62% in diets with 120g/kg MBM. Toe ash concentrations in NC diets containing MBM were similar to that in the PC diet (12.08%). This suggests that there were no Ca and P deficiencies in these diets so that significant phytase responses - in growth performance from the ‘phosphoric effect’ of the feed enzyme were observed.

It is not straightforward that FCR response to phytase was actually the most pronounced in diets with 120g/kg MBM. In diets without MBM, phytase reduced FCR by 4.0% (1.618 versus 1.554) from 15 to 36 days post-hatch and by 3.8% (1.583 versus 1.523) from 1 to 36 days post-hatch. However, in diets contained 120g/kg MBM, phytase reduced FCR by 4.5% (1.913 versus 1.827) from 15 to 36 days post-hatch and by 4.4% (1.844 versus 1.764) from 1 to 36 days post-hatch. As phytase did not influence toe ash concentration in diets contained 120g/kg MBM, this improvement may be due to ‘extra-phosphoric’ effects of phytase supplementation (Selle and Ravindran, 2007). Recently, Truong etal. (2015a) suggested that phytase may enhance absorption of glucose and amino acids by increasing Na+, -K+, -ATPase pump activity and this was evidenced by the correlation between apparent digestibility of Na and protein in the distal ileum and the increase of Na digestibility by phytase supplementation. It is possible but has yet to prove that the largest improvement of FCR in diets with 120g/kg MBM was due to better balanced absorption and availability of glucose and amino acids in response to the poorest amino acid digestion in diets with high MBM inclusion.

In the present study, weight gain and FCR in broiler chickens from 15 to 36 days post-hatch were correlated with distal ileal protein digestibility coefficients but not with starch and fat digestibilities. Liu and Selle (2015) suggested that protein availability may be more critical than starch availability for feed efficiency and protein deposition. The reason being that protein digestion in the gastrointestinal tract is usually slower and incomplete than that of starch (Liu etal., 2013). It is noteworthy that diets without MBM had significantly lower starch digestibility and diets with 120g/kg MBM had significantly lower protein digestibility than the other diets. However, broiler chickens offered diets with 120g/kg MBM had the poorest weight gain and FCR which proved the relative importance of protein digestion than starch. Therefore, protein digestion is more likely to be the limiting factor for growth performance and feed efficiency in broiler chickens.

Feed intake from 15 to 36 days post-hatch was negatively correlated with apparent distal ileal digestibility coefficients of protein and all 16 amino acids. Clearly, increased feed intakes may lead to shorter retention times along the gastrointestinal tract and reduced opportunities for digestion and absorption. The intake of digestible nutrients on a daily basis is more important than apparent digestibilities of nutrients. Consequently, Truong etal. (2015b) reported significant correlations between energy utilisation and disappearance rate ratio of starch and protein in the distal jejunum emphasising the importance of both the extent and site of nutrient digestion.

The prime outcome of the present study was the pronounced depressions in performance pursuant to MBM inclusions in broiler diets. A decade ago, as discussed by Selle etal. (2006), a surplus of MBM was produced in Australia and it was economically advantageous to include MBM as a source of P and protein in broiler diets. While Australia remains a MBM exporter, its price has escalated due to increasing demands from the pet-food and Aquaculture industries. As a consequence, MBM inclusions in broiler diets are now considerably less than 60 to 80g/kg, which once was typical, mainly for this and other reasons. However, the major negative impact of high inclusion of MBM was observed in protein and amino acid digestion. Experimental diets in the present study were formulated based on total amino acids; therefore, the findings from the present study do not necessarily set the limits on inclusion rate of MBM if diets were formulated on a digestible amino acid basis.

5. Conclusion

The hypothesis that MBM would depress broiler performance was valid because there were negative linear relationships between MBM inclusion levels and digestibilities of all 16 amino acids in the distal ileum and 120g/kg MBM significantly depressed apparent digestibility coefficients of 13 ex 16 amino acids. Additionally, phytase had the largest influence on weight gain in diets without MBM and the most pronounced impact on FCR was reported in diets with 120g/kg MBM. The results of toe ash concentration indicated there was not any Ca and P dietary deficiencies in diets contained MBM and the improvement on FCR in high MBM diets may be due to extra-phosphoric effects of phytase. The present study demonstrated that high inclusion levels of MBM in broiler diets are not recommended for broiler performance and protein utilisation if the diets are formulated on total amino acid basis.

Conflict of interest

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.

References

  • Batterham E.S., Darnell R.E., Herbert L.S., Major E.J. Effect of pressure and temperature on the availability of lysine in meat and bone meal as determined by slope-ratio assays with growing-pigs, rats and chicks and by chemical techniques. Br J Nutr. 1986;55:441–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Batterham E.S., Lowe R.F., Darnell R.E., Major E.J. Availability of lysine in meat meal, meat and bone meal and blood meal as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing-pigs, rats and chicks and by chemical techniques. Br J Nutr. 1986;55:427–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen S.A., Michaud D.P. Synthesis of a fluorescent derivatizing reagent, 6-aminoquinolyl-n-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate, and its application for the analysis of hydrolysate amino-acids via high-performance liquid-chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1993;211:279–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eastoe J.E., Long J.E. The amino-acid composition of processed bones and meat. JSci Food Agric. 1960;11:87–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Hendriks W.H., Butts C.A., Thomas D.V., James K.A.C., Morel P.C.A., Verstegen M.W.A. Nutritional quality and variation of meat and bone meal. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2002;15:1507–1516. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu S.Y., Selle P.H., Cowieson A.J. The kinetics of starch and nitrogen digestion regulate growth performance and nutrient utilisation in coarsely-ground, sorghum-based broiler diets. Anim Prod Sci. 2013;53:1033–1040. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu S.Y., Selle P.H. Aconsideration of starch and protein digestive dynamics in chicken-meat production. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2015;71:297–310. [Google Scholar]
  • Luque de Castro M.D.L., Priego-Capote F. Soxhlet extraction: past and present panacea. JChromatogr A. 2010;1217:2383–2389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahasukhonthachat K., Sopade P.A., Gidley M.J. Kinetics of starch digestion and functional properties of twin-screw extruded sorghum. JCereal Sci. 2010;51:392–401. [Google Scholar]
  • Ravindran V. Phytases in poultry nutrition. An overview. Proc Aust Poult Sci Symp. 1995;7:135–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Ravindran V., Hendriks W.H., Camden B.J., Thomas D.V., Morel P.C.H., Butts C.A. Amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals for broiler chickens. Aust J Agric Res. 2002;53:1257–1264. [Google Scholar]
  • Ravindran V., Hew L.I., Ravindran G., Bryden W.L. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in dietary ingredients for broiler chickens. Anim Sci. 2005;81:85–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Selle P.H., Walker A.R., Bryden W.L. Total and phytate-phosphorus contents and phytase activity of Australian-sourced feed ingredients for pigs and poultry. Aust J Exp Agric. 2003;43:475–479. [Google Scholar]
  • Selle P.H., Creswell D.C., Cadogan D.J., Partridge G.G., Scott T. Phytase supplementation of wheat-based broiler diets reduces dependence on meat-and-bone meal. JPoult Sci. 2006;43:330–338. [Google Scholar]
  • Selle P.H., Ravindran V. Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;135:1–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Selle P.H., Liu S.Y., Cai J., Cowieson A.J. Steam-pelleting and feed form of broiler diets based on three coarsely ground sorghums influences growth performance, nutrient utilisation, starch and nitrogen digestibility. Anim Prod Sci. 2012;52:842–852. [Google Scholar]
  • Siriwan P., Bryden W.L., Mollah Y., Annison E.F. Measurement of endogenous amino-acid losses in poultry. Br Poult Sci. 1993;34:939–949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skurray G.R. Nutritional-evaluation of meat meals for poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1974;30:129–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Truong H.H., Bold R.M., Liu S.Y., Selle P.H. Standard phytase inclusion in maize-based broiler diets enhances digestibility coefficients of starch, amino acids and sodium in four small intestinal segments and digestive dynamics of starch and protein. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2015;209:240–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Truong H.H., Neilson K.A., McInerney B.V., Khoddami A., Roberts T.H., Liu S.Y. Performance of broiler chickens offered nutritionally-equivalent diets based on two red grain sorghums with quantified kafirin concentrations as intact pellets or re-ground mash following steam-pelleting at 65 or 97°C conditioning temperatures. Anim Nutr. 2015;1:220–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang X., Parsons C.M. Effect of raw material source, processing systems, and processing temperatures on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals. Poult Sci. 1998;77:834–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Nutrition are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

The influence of meat-and-bone meal and exogenous phytase on growth performance, bone mineralisation and digestibility coefficients of protein (N), amino acids and starch in broiler chickens (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 6191

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.